EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Surface Subsidence Response to Safety Pillar Width Between Reactor Cavities in the Underground Gasification of Thin Coal Seams

Ivan Sakhno (), Svitlana Sakhno and Oleksandr Vovna
Additional contact information
Ivan Sakhno: Department of Mining, Mining and Metallurgy Faculty, Technical University “Metinvest Polytechnic” LLC., Pivdenne Shose 80, 69008 Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine
Svitlana Sakhno: Department of Mining, Mining and Metallurgy Faculty, Technical University “Metinvest Polytechnic” LLC., Pivdenne Shose 80, 69008 Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine
Oleksandr Vovna: Department of Mining, Mining and Metallurgy Faculty, Technical University “Metinvest Polytechnic” LLC., Pivdenne Shose 80, 69008 Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 6, 1-26

Abstract: Underground coal gasification (UCG) is a clean and automated coal technological process that has great potential. Environmental hazards such as the risk of ground surface subsidence, flooding, and water pollution are among the problems that restrict the application of UCG. Overburden rock stability above UCG cavities plays a key role in the prevention of the mentioned environmental hazards. It is necessary to optimize the safety pillar width to maintain rock stability and ensure minimal coal losses. This study focused on the investigation of the influence of pillar parameters on surface subsidence, taking into account the non-rectangular shape of the pillar and the presence of voids above the UCG reactor in the immediate roof. The main research was carried out using the finite element method in ANSYS 17.2 software. The results of the first simulation stage demonstrated that during underground gasification of a thin coal seam using the Controlled Retraction Injection Points method, with reactor cavities measuring 30 m in length and pillars ranging from 3.75 to 15 m in width, the surface subsidence and rock movement above gasification cavities remain within the pre-peak limits, provided the safety pillar’s bearing capacity is maintained. The probability of crack initiation in the rock mass and subsequent environmental hazards is low. However, in the case of the safety pillars’ destruction, there is a high risk of crack evolution in the overburden rock. In the case of crack formation above the gasification panel, the destruction of aquiferous sandstones and water breakthroughs into the gasification cavities become possible. The surface infrastructure is therefore at risk of destruction. The assessment of the pillars’ stability was carried out at the second stage using numerical simulation. The study of the stress–strain state and temperature distribution in the surrounding rocks near a UCG reactor shows that the size of the heat-affected zone of the UCG reactor is less than the thickness of the coal seam. This shows that there is no significant direct influence of the gasification process on the stability of the surrounding rocks around previously excavated cavities. The coal seam failure in the side walls of the UCG reactor, which occurs during gasification, leads to a reduction in the useful width of the safety pillar. The algorithm applied in this study enables the optimization of pillar width under any mining and geological conditions. This makes it possible to increase the safety and reliability of the UCG process. For the conditions of this research, the failure of coal at the stage of gasification led to a decrease in the useful width of the safety pillar by 0.5 m. The optimal width of the pillar was 15 m.

Keywords: underground coal gasification; pillars stability; surface subsidence; multiple gasification cavities; thin coal seam gasification; safety pillar width (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2533/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2533/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2533-:d:1611768

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2533-:d:1611768