EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Suitability Evaluation of Underground Space Development by Considering Socio-Economic Factors—An Empirical Study from Longgang Region of China

Wenrong Ye, Ji Huang, Pengfei Xu, Jing Yuan, Li Zeng, Yuzhi Zhang (), Yiming Wang, Shaokai Wang, Xiongchao Xu, Zizheng Guo and Yuhua Zhang
Additional contact information
Wenrong Ye: The Eleventh Geological Brigade of Zhejiang Province, Wenzhou 325006, China
Ji Huang: The Eleventh Geological Brigade of Zhejiang Province, Wenzhou 325006, China
Pengfei Xu: The Eleventh Geological Brigade of Zhejiang Province, Wenzhou 325006, China
Jing Yuan: The Eleventh Geological Brigade of Zhejiang Province, Wenzhou 325006, China
Li Zeng: The Eleventh Geological Brigade of Zhejiang Province, Wenzhou 325006, China
Yuzhi Zhang: The Eleventh Geological Brigade of Zhejiang Province, Wenzhou 325006, China
Yiming Wang: College of Architectural Engineering, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China
Shaokai Wang: The Eleventh Geological Brigade of Zhejiang Province, Wenzhou 325006, China
Xiongchao Xu: The Eleventh Geological Brigade of Zhejiang Province, Wenzhou 325006, China
Zizheng Guo: School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China
Yuhua Zhang: The Bartlett Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, Faculty of the Built Environment, University College London (UCL), London W1T4TJ, UK

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 7, 1-28

Abstract: Underground space is considered a critical urban resource that can significantly promote sustainable development under rational planning. This study, taking the Longgang region in SE China as an example, comprehensively considers the dual influences of geological environmental factors and socio-economic factors, incorporating socio-economic factors as key cost indicators. Following the principle of “stratification and classification”, a detailed assessment framework was developed to evaluate the suitability of underground space for development across various depths, and a systematic analysis of development suitability was conducted. Specifically, we employed a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to assess the suitability of underground space. During this process, an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used to determine the weights of geological environmental indicators, and the group judgment matrix approach was applied to assign weights to the socio-economic factors. The results indicated that, for shallow spaces, areas with high resource potential accounted for approximately 10.0% of the region, while areas with relatively high resource potential accounted for 28.5%. For medium-depth spaces, areas with high resource potential comprised 19.9% of the region, and areas with relatively high resource potential accounted for about 35.1%. These findings suggest that the study area demonstrated promising prospects for the development and utilization of underground space. The proposed approaches ensured that the evaluation results were both scientific and reasonable. By integrating the impact of socio-economic factors into suitability evaluation, the outputs provided more scientifically grounded guidance for urban planning.

Keywords: suitability evaluation; underground space; fuzzy comprehensive evaluation; socio-economic factors; analytic hierarchy process (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/2788/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/2788/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:2788-:d:1617037

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:2788-:d:1617037