Collaborative Adaptive Management in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem: A Rangeland Living Laboratory at the US Sheep Experiment Station

Hailey Wilmer (), Jonathan Spiess, Patrick E. Clark, Michelle Anderson, Amira Burns, Arica Crootof, Lily Fanok, Tracy Hruska, Bruce J. Mincher, Ryan S. Miller, William Munger, Christian J. Posbergh, Carrie S. Wilson, Eric Winford, Jessica Windh, Nicole Strong, Marlen Eve and J. Bret Taylor
Additional contact information
Hailey Wilmer: Range Sheep Production Efficiency Research Unit, US Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, Dubois, ID 83423, USA
Jonathan Spiess: Range Sheep Production Efficiency Research Unit, US Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, Dubois, ID 83423, USA
Patrick E. Clark: Northwest Watershed Research Center, US Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, Boise, ID 83712, USA
Michelle Anderson: Department of Biology, University of Montana-Western, Dillon, MT 59725, USA
Amira Burns: Range Sheep Production Efficiency Research Unit, US Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, Dubois, ID 83423, USA
Arica Crootof: Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Montana-Western, Dillon, MT 59725, USA
Lily Fanok: Range Sheep Production Efficiency Research Unit, US Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, Dubois, ID 83423, USA
Tracy Hruska: Faculty of Humanities, University of Oulu, Pentti Kaiteran Katu 1, 90570 Oulu, Finland
Bruce J. Mincher: Idaho Wild Sheep Foundation, Boise, ID 83707, USA
Ryan S. Miller: Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health, US Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, CO 80524, USA
William Munger: Range Sheep Production Efficiency Research Unit, US Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, Dubois, ID 83423, USA
Christian J. Posbergh: Department of Animal & Range Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA
Carrie S. Wilson: Range Sheep Production Efficiency Research Unit, US Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, Dubois, ID 83423, USA
Eric Winford: Department of Forest, Rangeland, and Fire Sciences, University of Idaho, Boise, ID 83702, USA
Jessica Windh: Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Idaho Extension, Twin Falls, ID 83301, USA
Nicole Strong: Range Sheep Production Efficiency Research Unit, US Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, Dubois, ID 83423, USA
Marlen Eve: Office of National Programs, US Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA
J. Bret Taylor: Range Sheep Production Efficiency Research Unit, US Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, Dubois, ID 83423, USA

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 7, 1-33

Abstract: Social conflict over rangeland-use priorities, especially near protected areas, has long pitted environmental and biodiversity conservation interests against livestock livelihoods. Social–ecological conflict limits management adaptation and creativity while reinforcing social and disciplinary divisions. It can also reduce rancher access to land and negatively affect wildlife conservation. Communities increasingly expect research organizations to address complex social dynamics to improve opportunities for multiple ecosystem service delivery on rangelands. In the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE), an area of the western US, long-standing disagreements among actors who argue for the use of the land for livestock and those who prioritize wildlife are limiting conservation and ranching livelihoods. Researchers at the USDA-ARS US Sheep Experiment Station (USSES) along with University and societal partners are responding to these challenges using a collaborative adaptive management (CAM) methodology. The USSES Rangeland Collaboratory is a living laboratory project leveraging the resources of a federal range sheep research ranch operating across sagebrush steppe ecosystems in Clark County, Idaho, and montane/subalpine landscapes in Beaverhead County, Montana. The project places stakeholders, including ranchers, conservation groups, and government land managers, in the decision-making seat for a participatory case study. This involves adaptive management planning related to grazing and livestock–wildlife management decisions for two ranch-scale rangeland management scenarios, one modeled after a traditional range sheep operation and the second, a more intensified operation with no use of summer ranges. We discuss the extent to which the CAM approach creates opportunities for multi-directional learning among participants and evaluate trade-offs among preferred management systems through participatory ranch-scale grazing research. In a complex system where the needs and goals of various actors are misaligned across spatiotemporal, disciplinary, and social–ecological scales, CAM creates a structure and methods to focus on social learning and land management knowledge creation.

Keywords: working lands; range sheep production; wildlife conservation; social science; transdisciplinary; living laboratory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3086/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3086/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3086-:d:1624917

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().