A Critical Review of Life Cycle Assessments on Bioenergy Technologies: Methodological Choices, Limitations, and Suggestions for Future Studies

Kan Wang (), Ruiqing Tong, Qiang Zhai, Guomin Lyu and Yongsheng Li
Additional contact information
Kan Wang: School of Mechanical, Electrical & Information Engineering, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China
Ruiqing Tong: School of Mechanical, Electrical & Information Engineering, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China
Qiang Zhai: School of Mechanical, Electrical & Information Engineering, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China
Guomin Lyu: China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, No.1 Fuxing Road, Beijing 100048, China
Yongsheng Li: Shandong Tianrui Heavy Industry Co., Ltd., Weifang 261001, China

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 8, 1-25

Abstract: Bioenergy is one of the renewable energy sources with high expectations in terms of its potential for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions mitigation, and thus has been included in most global warming limiting strategies and pathways. However, within this context, a state-of-the-art and comprehensive understanding of the environmental performance of currently available bioenergy technologies is still missing. Hence, we conduct this critical review on life cycle assessment (LCA) studies regarding a wide portfolio of bioenergy technologies to deal with this lack of knowledge. Our critical review of exhaustively searched literature identified commonly existing limitations and difficulties in the selected LCAs in terms of essential aspects of LCA, i.e., system boundaries, functional unit (FU), multifunctionality, and impact categories. Key findings of our review are as follows: inconsistency of system boundary definitions, incomparability of LCA results due to various FU definitions, incomprehensiveness of impact categories, as well as a lack of uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Finally, in view of the above findings, we present a generic guideline for future studies with the purpose of overcoming the identified shortcomings.

Keywords: biomass; biopower; biofuel; life cycle assessment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3415/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3415/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3415-:d:1632814

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().