How Do Bird Population Trends Relate to Human Pressures Compared to Economic Growth?

Leonor Baptista (), Tiago Domingos, João Santos and Vânia Proença
Additional contact information
Leonor Baptista: MARETEC—Marine, Environment and Technology Centre, LARSyS—Laboratory for Robotics and Engineering Systems, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
Tiago Domingos: MARETEC—Marine, Environment and Technology Centre, LARSyS—Laboratory for Robotics and Engineering Systems, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
João Santos: MARETEC—Marine, Environment and Technology Centre, LARSyS—Laboratory for Robotics and Engineering Systems, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
Vânia Proença: MARETEC—Marine, Environment and Technology Centre, LARSyS—Laboratory for Robotics and Engineering Systems, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 8, 1-22

Abstract: Biodiversity loss is a global environmental concern, mainly driven by human-induced factors, encompassing both direct and indirect drivers. This study investigates the long-term relationship between either the Human Footprint Index (HFI), which measures the extent of human pressures (i.e., direct drivers), or the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a measure of economic growth (i.e., indirect driver) and biodiversity change, using bird population trends as indicators. The analysis was based on time-series data for Portugal (2004–2023) aggregated at national and sub-national scales, representative of different socio-economic contexts. Multi-species indices were regressed against either the HFI or GDP using Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) to identify long-run relationships. Bird population trends varied by species group (common, agricultural, and forest birds) and socio-economic context underscoring the importance of sub-national assessments. The HFI and GDP had varying predictive value across species groups and socio-economic contexts, with the HFI showing greater consistency, particularly as a predictor for agricultural birds. While most models showed a negative association between species abundance and either the HFI or GDP, revealing a signal of socio-economic pressures on bird populations at sub-national scales, some models suggested mixed results, indicating that conservation policies must take local contexts into account.

Keywords: biodiversity; economic growth; human footprint index; common bird index; bird population abundance; time series (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3506/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3506/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3506-:d:1634403

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().