A Novel Method for Estimating Soil Organic Carbon Density Using Soil Organic Carbon and Gravel Content Data

Jiawen Fan, Guanghui Zheng (), Caixia Jiao, Rong Zeng, Yujie Zhou, Yan Wang, Mingxing Xu and Chengyi Zhao
Additional contact information
Jiawen Fan: School of Geographic Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
Guanghui Zheng: School of Geographic Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
Caixia Jiao: School of Geographic Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
Rong Zeng: School of Geographic Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
Yujie Zhou: School of Geographic Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
Yan Wang: School of Geographic Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
Mingxing Xu: Zhejiang Institute of Geological Survey, Hangzhou 311203, China
Chengyi Zhao: School of Geographic Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 8, 1-27

Abstract: Soil organic carbon density (SOCD) is crucial for assessing soil organic carbon (SOC) storage, but its estimation remains challenging when bulk density (BD) data are unavailable. Traditional methods for substituting missing BD data, including using the mean, median, and pedotransfer functions (PTFs), introduce varying degrees of uncertainty in SOCD estimation: (1) The mean and median methods ignore the effects of soil type, environmental conditions, and land use changes on BD. They also heavily rely on the representativeness of soil samples, which may lead to systematic bias. (2) The accuracy of PTFs depends on modeling approaches, variable selection, and dataset characteristics, and differences among PTFs may introduce estimation biases in SOCD. To overcome this challenge, we analyzed 443 soil profiles from the Yangtze River Delta region of China and developed an innovative approach that estimates SOCD using only SOC and gravel content data. By formulating linear, polynomial, and power function regression models, we directly estimated SOCD per centimeter of soil horizon i (SOCD icm ) under conditions with and without available gravel content data, followed by SOCD calculation. The results indicated a strong correlation between SOC and SOCD icm , with the three function models for direct SOC-based SOCD icm estimation yielding consistently high accuracy. Neglecting gravel content overall resulted in the overestimation of SOCD icm by 7.01–9.45%. After incorporating gravel content as a correction factor, the accuracy of the new method for estimating SOCD was improved, with the prediction set achieving R² values of 0.927–0.945, an RMSE of 0.819–0.949 kg m −2 , and an RPIQ of 4.773–5.533. The accuracy of estimating SOCD surpassed that of the BD mean and median methods and was comparable to that of the PTF method, thus enabling reliable SOCD estimation. This study introduces an innovative approach by developing regional models to estimate SOCD icm , enabling rapid SOCD estimation for samples with missing BD information in historical data, and provides a new methodology for calculating regional and global SOC stocks. This study contributes to improving the accuracy of soil carbon stock estimation, supporting land management and carbon cycle research, and providing scientific evidence for sustainable agricultural development and climate change mitigation strategies.

Keywords: soil organic carbon; soil organic carbon density; bulk density; pedotransfer functions; sustainable agricultural development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3533/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3533/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3533-:d:1635015

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().