Life Cycle Assessment and Circularity Indicators of Earth-Retaining Walls and Mechanically Stabilized Earth

Luiz Paulo Vieira de Araújo Junior (), Cristiane Bueno and Jefferson Lins da Silva
Additional contact information
Luiz Paulo Vieira de Araújo Junior: Department of Civil Engineering, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos 13565905, SP, Brazil
Cristiane Bueno: Department of Civil Engineering, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos 13565905, SP, Brazil
Jefferson Lins da Silva: São Carlos School of Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Carlos 13566590, SP, Brazil

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 9, 1-22

Abstract: Although there has been a notable increase in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) studies in civil engineering, the field of Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) with geosynthetics remains relatively underexplored. This research aimed to perform LCA together with a circularity analysis of countries that could represent the South American context. The materials and methods section covers an environmental analysis using LCA, spanning the manufacturing phase to the end of the structures of MSE with different geosynthetics, comparing Earth-Retaining Walls (ERWs), employing the ReCiPe method. Material circularity analyses for the three structures under consideration were performed using the Material Circularity Indicator (MCI). The proposed scenarios were conducted not only when recycled materials were introduced to replace virgin materials, but also when examining the concrete face and incorporating vegetation planting. The results suggest that MSEs can be environmentally more sustainable than ERWs. Therefore, the decreases were 80%in almost all categories. Furthermore, the material circularity analysis indicated that the incorporation of recycled materials increased the MCI, achieving 250% circularity for geosynthetics. Thus, it was inferred that the LCA methodology and circularity analysis effectively enabled qualitative and quantitative assessments. Notably, the findings highlighted the superior environmental sustainability of soil structures compared to their concrete counterparts.

Keywords: circularity; environmental impacts; geosynthetics; life cycle assessment; sustainability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3769/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3769/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3769-:d:1639674

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().