Integrating Cross-Regional Ecological Networks in Blue–Green Spaces: A Spatial Planning Approach for the Yangtze River Delta Demonstration Area

Lu Feng (), Yan Gong and Zhiyuan Liang
Additional contact information
Lu Feng: Landscape Planning and Design, School of Art Design and Media, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China
Yan Gong: Landscape Planning and Design, School of Art Design and Media, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China
Zhiyuan Liang: Landscape Planning and Design, School of Art Design and Media, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China

Sustainability, 2025, vol. 17, issue 9, 1-28

Abstract: The rapid pace of urbanization is contributing to ecological degradation and poses a threat to regional ecological security. Addressing these issues requires effective strategies to mitigate existing environmental challenges. Ecological networks, as the spatial foundation for ecosystem services, play a critical role in reducing environmental degradation. By reconfiguring the spatial relationship between human activities and natural ecosystems, anthropogenic pressures on land can be alleviated. However, most current research focuses on administrative boundaries, which limits spatial continuity and regional coordination. Therefore, constructing ecological networks from a cross-regional perspective is essential for integrated ecological management. This study uses the Yangtze River Delta Ecological Green Integration Demonstration Area as a case study. We construct a blue–green ecological network by applying ecological footprint analysis, Morphological Spatial Pattern Analysis (MSPA), landscape connectivity assessments, the Minimum Cumulative Resistance (MCR) model, and gravity modeling. Practical strategies for integrating the ecological network into territorial spatial planning are also explored. The key findings are as follows: (1) The demonstration area contains 33 ecological source areas, including 20 primary sources located near administrative boundaries and central lakeshore wetlands. A total of 333 ecological corridors were identified. First-grade corridors are primarily located in rural areas, traversing agricultural land and water bodies. (2) We recommend corridor widths of 200 m for first-grade corridors, 60 m for second-grade corridors, and 30 m for third-grade corridors. These widths are based on species characteristics and land use types, and are found to be conducive to species migration and habitat connectivity. (3) We propose the development of tourism landscape zones from a cross-regional perspective, leveraging existing ecological and cultural resources. The multifunctionality of corridors is redefined through the integration of ecological and social values, enhancing their spatial implementation. This framework provides a practical reference for constructing cross-regional blue–green ecological networks and informs spatial planning efforts in other multi-jurisdictional areas.

Keywords: blue green space networks; MSPA; MCR; ecological footprint (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4193/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4193/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4193-:d:1650075

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().