Mapping the Relationship of Inter-Village Variation in Agroforestry Tree Survival with Social and Ecological Characteristics: The Case of the Vi Agroforestry Project, Mara Region, Tanzania
Karl-Erik Johansson,
Robert Axelsson and
Ngolia Kimanzu
Additional contact information
Karl-Erik Johansson: Forest-Landscape-Society research group, School for Forest Management, Faculty of Forest Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-73921 Skinnskatteberg, Sweden
Robert Axelsson: Forest-Landscape-Society research group, School for Forest Management, Faculty of Forest Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-73921 Skinnskatteberg, Sweden
Ngolia Kimanzu: Social Capital Innovations International, Box 569, SE-10110 Stockholm, Sweden
Sustainability, 2013, vol. 5, issue 12, 1-24
Abstract:
Agroforestry practices can improve the adaptive capacity and resilience of local farming and subsistence systems while providing livelihood benefits to households. However, scaling up of agroforestry technology has often proved difficult. Many studies have been carried out to explain the lack of tangible impact, based mainly on formal household/farm surveys comparing characteristics of non-adopters with that of adopters. In this study, we mapped the relationship between agroforestry tree survival in villages that were a part of the Vi Agroforestry project in the Mara region, Tanzania with key social-ecological variables. A random sample of 21 households from each of 89 investigated project villages was used. The proportion of households with surviving agroforestry trees, varied from 10%–90% among villages. Social and ecological differences between villages were important explanations to this variation. Variables related to the project and its operations explained most of the inter-village variation in households with few surviving trees. To encourage the majority of village households to practice agroforestry their perceptions of tree ownership and the benefit of agroforestry were additional key factors to the project showing the importance of socio-cultural issues to the households’ decisions to continue beyond the initial tree planting and testing phase.
Keywords: dissemination; adaptation; adoption; livelihood; sustainable development; poverty alleviation; agro-ecological resilience (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/5/12/5171/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/5/12/5171/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:5:y:2013:i:12:p:5171-5194:d:31052
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().