The Rise, Fall and Potential Resilience Benefits of Jatropha in Southern Africa
Graham Von Maltitz,
Alexandros Gasparatos and
Christo Fabricius
Additional contact information
Graham Von Maltitz: Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), P.O. Box 359, Pretoria 0001, South Africa
Alexandros Gasparatos: Integrated Research System in Sustainability Science (IR3S), University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan
Christo Fabricius: Sustainability Research Unit, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University (George Campus), P/Bag X6531, George 6530, South Africa
Sustainability, 2014, vol. 6, issue 6, 1-29
Abstract:
Jatropha is the latest in a list of “miracle crops” that have been promoted in southern Africa for their perceived development benefits. This was based on promises of high yields, low water requirement, ability to grow on marginal land and lack of competition with food. In less than 10 years, tens of thousands of hectares were acquired for jatropha plantations and thousands of hectares were planted, most of which are now unused or abandoned. Overestimations of jatropha yields coupled with underestimations of the management costs have probably been the prime contributors to the collapse of most jatropha projects in southern African. However, a few projects still survive and show signs of possible long-term sustainability. We consider two such projects, a smallholder-based project in Malawi and a large-scale plantation in Mozambique. Though their long-term sustainability is not proven, both projects may increase resilience by diversifying household income streams and contributing to national fuel security. By identifying what seems to be working in these projects we provide insights as to why other projects may have failed in southern Africa and whether there is still place for jatropha in the region. In essence can jatropha still enhance local/national resilience or are jatropha’s benefits just a myth?
Keywords: jatropha; biofuels; southern Africa; Malawi; Mozambique; smallholder scheme; large plantation; resilience (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (22)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/6/3615/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/6/3615/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:6:y:2014:i:6:p:3615-3643:d:36778
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().