Assessment of Progressive Product Innovation on Key Environmental Indicators: Pampers ® Baby Wipes from 2007–2013

Gert Van Hoof, Annie Weisbrod and Bettina Kruse
Additional contact information
Gert Van Hoof: Procter & Gamble, Temselaan 100, B-1853 Strombeek-Bever, Belgium
Annie Weisbrod: Procter & Gamble, 6280 Center Hill Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45224, USA
Bettina Kruse: Procter & Gamble, Sulzbacher Straße 40, 65824 Schwalbach am Taunus, Germany

Sustainability, 2014, vol. 6, issue 8, 1-14

Abstract: Companies are increasingly conducting life cycle assessments (LCA) of their products to understand potential product impacts on the environment, prioritize areas of innovation to create more sustainable products, and determine valid claims. This case study shows the results of product innovation by comparing an older (2007) and new (2013) version of a common hygiene product in Europe and the U.S. The standard methodology follows the ISO 14040/44 Guidelines for LCA. Results are reported for the impact indicators with high relevance for the product category: primary energy, global warming, particulates, agricultural land occupation, fossil fuel depletion, and solid waste generation. Generally, raw material supply chains for product and packaging contribute most (up to 82%) to the calculated environmental impact indicators. Improvements vs. the 2007 baby wipe range between 4% and 14% in Europe and between 15% and 36% in the U.S. The improvement is driven by a new substrate technology that provides more surface area for cleaning, which results in lower use of resources. This case study illustrates three key environmental drivers behind this innovation: the corporate focus on R&D capability to design for environmentally improved products, the increased interest from retailers and consumers requiring accurate and relevant information on the performance and sustainability of products, and the company’s interest in deeper technical understanding of contributions from upstream material and process innovations on a product’s environmental profile.

Keywords: sustainable innovation; consumer product; baby wipe; LCA; environmental sustainability; multi-criteria decision (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/8/5129/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/8/5129/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:6:y:2014:i:8:p:5129-5142:d:39048

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().