EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Assessment of Passive vs. Active Strategies for a School Building Design

Ji Eun Kang, Ki Uhn Ahn, Cheol Soo Park and Thorsten Schuetze
Additional contact information
Ji Eun Kang: Department of u-City Design and Engineering, SungKyunKwan University, Suwon, Gyeonggi 16419, Korea
Ki Uhn Ahn: School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, SungKyunKwan University, Suwon, Gyeonggi 16419, Korea
Cheol Soo Park: School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, SungKyunKwan University, Suwon, Gyeonggi 16419, Korea
Thorsten Schuetze: Department of Architecture, SungKyunKwan University, Suwon, Gyeonggi 16419, Korea

Sustainability, 2015, vol. 7, issue 11, 1-16

Abstract: This paper presents a simulation study to reduce heating and cooling energy demand of a school building in Seoul Metropolitan Area, Korea. The aim of this study was to estimate the impact of passive vs. active approaches on energy savings in buildings using EnergyPlus simulation. By controlling lighting, the energy saving of the original school building design was found most significant, and increased by 32% when the design was improved. It is noteworthy that energy saving potential of each room varies significantly depending on the rooms’ thermal characteristics and orientation. Thus, the analysis of energy saving should be introduced at the individual space level, not at the whole building level. Additionally, the simulation studies should be involved for rational decision-making. Finally, it was concluded that priority should be given to passive building design strategies, such as building orientation, as well as control and utilization of solar radiation. These passive energy saving strategies are related to urban, architectural design, and engineering issues, and are more beneficial in terms of energy savings than active strategies.

Keywords: energy efficiency; passive; active; building design strategies; architectural engineering; energy simulation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/11/15136/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/11/15136/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:11:p:15136-15151:d:58919

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:11:p:15136-15151:d:58919