Environmental and Social Sustainability of the Proximity Waste Collection System: A Case-Study Evaluation at an Italian Local Scale

Manuela Carchesio, Fabio Tatàno, Margherita Goffi and Michele Radi
Additional contact information
Manuela Carchesio: DISBeF-Department of Basic Sciences and Foundations, University of Urbino "Carlo Bo", Campus Scientifico "E. Mattei", Urbino I-61029, Italy
Fabio Tatàno: DISBeF-Department of Basic Sciences and Foundations, University of Urbino "Carlo Bo", Campus Scientifico "E. Mattei", Urbino I-61029, Italy
Margherita Goffi: DISBeF-Department of Basic Sciences and Foundations, University of Urbino "Carlo Bo", Campus Scientifico "E. Mattei", Urbino I-61029, Italy
Michele Radi: DISBeF-Department of Basic Sciences and Foundations, University of Urbino "Carlo Bo", Campus Scientifico "E. Mattei", Urbino I-61029, Italy

Sustainability, 2015, vol. 7, issue 6, 1-20

Abstract: In an urban or suburban area, the sustainability of a waste management process is expected to be closely related to the territorial context and the local citizens’ behaviour. From this perspective, the implementation of the peculiar proximity waste collection system in a small town in Central Italy (San Costanzo) was considered. As compared to the previous road collection system in the same municipality, its environmental performance in terms of Source Separation Level (SSL), Waste Generation or Collection Rate (WGR or WCR) and Interception Rate (IR) was evaluated. An original analysis of the citizens’ monthly frequency and of their participation rate both in relation to the setting out of the Unsorted Residual Waste (URW) was also carried out. Following the full implementation of the new waste collection scheme, the SSL achieved almost 79%, the WCR of the URW decreased by about 82% and the most IR values resulted above 83%. From a social point of view, the study further highlighted that, with the new waste collection scheme active, more than 50% of users were accustomed to set out the URW at most 5 times per month and the corresponding participation rate to set out the URW was around 62%.

Keywords: separate collection; proximity collection scheme; citizens’ behavior; source separation level; waste generation rate; waste collection rate; interception rate (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/6/7492/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/6/7492/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:6:p:7492-7511:d:51003

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().