Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Two On-Site Small-Scale Activated Sludge Total Oxidation Systems in Plastic and Vibrated Reinforced Concrete
Giovanni De Feo,
Carmen Ferrara and
Giovanni Iuliano
Additional contact information
Giovanni De Feo: Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, via Giovanni Paolo II, 132-84084 Fisciano, Italy
Carmen Ferrara: Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, via Giovanni Paolo II, 132-84084 Fisciano, Italy
Giovanni Iuliano: Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, via Giovanni Paolo II, 132-84084 Fisciano, Italy
Sustainability, 2016, vol. 8, issue 3, 1-17
Abstract:
This study proposes a comparison of the environmental impacts calculated with the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology of two on-site small-scale activated sludge total oxidation systems in linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) and vibrated reinforced concrete (VRC). The plants were designed to ensure a treatment capacity of 5, 10, 20 and 30 equivalent inhabitants (PE). The main aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence of construction, disposal and operation phases on the total impacts evaluated with three different methods: ReCiPe 2008, Ecological Footprint and IPCC 2007 100 years. The most significant phase for both treatment lines was the use phase, which contributed more than 80% to the total impacts. The construction phase was the second most impactful phase with an incidence less than 25% for both systems and for all the considered impacts assessment methods. The plant in LLDPE was more eco-friendly than that in (VRC). The plant in VRC was always most impactful, even comparing each single phase of the life cycle and for all the treatment capacities taken into consideration. Finally, the obtained results were not dependent on the impact assessment method considered.
Keywords: activated sludge; comparison; Ecological Footprint; IPCC; LCA; plastic; ReCiPe; total oxidation; small-scale; vibrated reinforced concrete (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/3/212/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/3/212/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:3:p:212-:d:64576
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().