System Merits or Failures? Policies for Transition to Sustainable P and N Systems in The Netherlands and Finland
Thomas Hoppe,
Anna Kuokkanen,
Mirja Mikkilä,
Helena Kahiluoto,
Miia Kuisma,
Maarten Arentsen and
Lassi Linnanen
Additional contact information
Thomas Hoppe: Policy, Organisation, Law & Gaming (POLG), Department of Multi-Actor Systems (MAS), Faculty of Technology, Policy & Management (TPM), Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 5, 2628 BX Delft, The Netherlands
Anna Kuokkanen: Sustainability Science, School of Energy Systems, Lappeenranta University of Technology, FI-53851 Lappeenranta, Finland
Mirja Mikkilä: Sustainability Science, School of Energy Systems, Lappeenranta University of Technology, FI-53851 Lappeenranta, Finland
Helena Kahiluoto: Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Jokiniemenkuja 1, 03170 Vantaa, Finland
Miia Kuisma: Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Jokiniemenkuja 1, 03170 Vantaa, Finland
Maarten Arentsen: Department of Governance and Technology for Sustainability (CSTM), Institute of Innovation and Governance Studies (IGS), Faculty of Behavioral, Management and Social Sciences (BMS), University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
Lassi Linnanen: Sustainability Science, School of Energy Systems, Lappeenranta University of Technology, FI-53851 Lappeenranta, Finland
Sustainability, 2016, vol. 8, issue 5, 1-28
Abstract:
Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) cycles are absolutely vital in maintaining sustainable food systems. Human activities disturb the natural balance of these cycles by creating enormous additional nutrient fluxes, causing eutrophication of waterways and pollution in land systems. To tackle this problem, sustainable nutrient management is required. This paper addresses sustainable nutrient management in two countries: The Netherlands and Finland. We adopt a critical perspective on resource politics, especially towards opportunistic policy strategies for the pollutant management of N and P. Two research questions are considered. First, what are the key systemic and policy failures that occurred in the N and P systems in the Netherlands and Finland between 1970 and 2015? And second, which lessons can be drawn when addressing the policy responses in the two countries to cope with these failures? The cases are analyzed within Weber and Rohracher’s framework that addresses “failures” preventing sustainable transitions. The results show that a number of failures occurred, besides market failures (over-exploitation of the commons, externalization of costs): lack of directionality, policy coordination, institutions, capabilities, infrastructure, demand articulation, and reflexivity. Policy responses in both countries resulted in ponderous policy frameworks that were adequate to tackle nutrient problems from the industrial sector and municipalities. However, both countries provided only a moderate response in terms of system-wide integrated policy frameworks to cope with sectoral-transcending issues. The agricultural use of N and P, in contrast to detergents, has not been subjected to strong regulatory measures.
Keywords: sustainable transition; nitrogen; phosphorus; environmental policy; policy failure (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/5/463/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/5/463/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:5:p:463-:d:69788
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().