Sustainability Measures of Urban Public Transport in Cities: A World Review and Focus on the Asia/Middle East Region

Chris De Gruyter, Graham Currie and Geoff Rose
Additional contact information
Chris De Gruyter: Public Transport Research Group, Institute of Transport Studies, Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, 23 College Walk, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
Graham Currie: Public Transport Research Group, Institute of Transport Studies, Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, 23 College Walk, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
Geoff Rose: Institute of Transport Studies, Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, 23 College Walk, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia

Sustainability, 2016, vol. 9, issue 1, 1-21

Abstract: Previous studies of public transport sustainability in cities have been very limited to date, particularly in more developing countries located throughout Asia and the Middle East. This paper assesses the sustainability of urban public transport systems in cities by adopting a quantitative measurement framework containing 15 public transport sustainability indicators. It compares aggregate sustainability performance of urban public transport in international regions of cities, and then examines the relative sustainability of selected cities in the Asia and Middle East region. The world region analysis shows that Eastern Europe, Asia, and Latin America achieve the highest aggregate normalised scores for sustainable public transport, in that order. In general, the results suggest that western developed countries (Western Europe, North America, and Oceania) have better performance on environmental and social indicators but poorer performance on system effectiveness and economic indicators. Asia and Latin America perform the other way round; better on economic and system effectiveness and worse on social and environmental indicators. Eastern Europe is one of the few regions with higher level performance all round. The city-based analysis of Asia/Middle East suggested that out of the 26 cities studied, the top 3 cities in terms of sustainable public transport in the Asia and Middle East Region are: 1st, Manila (Philippines); 2nd, Tokyo (Japan); and 3rd, Chennai (India). Dubai (United Arab Emirates (UAE), rated 26th), Shizuoka (Japan, rated 25th) and Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia, rated 24th) were the lowest rated cities. The paper explores the implications of the findings and makes suggestions for future research.

Keywords: public transport; transit; sustainability; Asia; Middle East; world review; cities (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/1/43/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/1/43/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2016:i:1:p:43-:d:86417

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().