Effects of Land Use Change for Crops on Water and Carbon Budgets in the Midwest USA
Jian Sun,
Tracy E. Twine,
Jason Hill,
Ryan Noe,
Jiancheng Shi and
Minmin Li
Additional contact information
Jian Sun: Department of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
Tracy E. Twine: Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA
Jason Hill: Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA
Ryan Noe: Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA
Jiancheng Shi: State Key Laboratory for Remote Sensing Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 20 Datun Road, Beijing 100101, China
Minmin Li: Renewable Resources Division, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 20 Datun Road, Beijing 100101, China
Sustainability, 2017, vol. 9, issue 2, 1-14
Abstract:
Increasing demand for food and bioenergy has altered the global landscape dramatically in recent years. Land use and land cover change affects the environmental system in many ways through biophysical and biogeochemical mechanisms. In this study, we evaluate the impacts of land use and land cover change driven by recent crop expansion and conversion on the water budget, carbon exchange, and carbon storage in the Midwest USA. A dynamic global vegetation model was used to simulate and examine the impacts of landscape change in a historical case based on crop distribution data from the United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Services. The simulation results indicate that recent crop expansion not only decreased soil carbon sequestration (60 Tg less of soil organic carbon) and net carbon flux into ecosystems (3.7 Tg·year −1 less of net biome productivity), but also lessened water consumption through evapotranspiration (1.04 × 10 10 m 3 ·year −1 less) over 12 states in the Midwest. More water yield at the land surface does not necessarily make more water available for vegetation. Crop residue removal might also exacerbate the soil carbon loss.
Keywords: land use and land cover change; agriculture; evapotranspiration; soil organic carbon; net biome productivity; Agro-IBIS (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/225/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/225/ (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:225-:d:89558
Access Statistics for this article
Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu
More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().