Political Response to Foot-and-Mouth Disease: A Review of Korean News

Chang-Ryong Ko, Sung-Soo Seol and Geonha Kim
Additional contact information
Chang-Ryong Ko: Department of Economics, College of Economics and Business Administration, Hannam University, Daejeon 34430, Korea
Sung-Soo Seol: Department of Economics, College of Economics and Business Administration, Hannam University, Daejeon 34430, Korea
Geonha Kim: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, Hannam University, Daejeon 34430, Korea

Sustainability, 2017, vol. 9, issue 3, 1-11

Abstract: The 2010/2011 foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) outbreak in Korea produced about 4500 burial sites for 3.5 million animal carcasses, which can be summarized as quick, mass burials, at or near the outbreak farms. An FMD outbreak has occurred nearly every year since the big outbreak, although the sizes of these outbreaks have been small. This article presents the rationale behind government policies for FMD outbreaks and disposal sites, the secrecy of the government administration and the neglect of scientific data. We compared government news announcements with news from the non-governmental sector by analyzing all the news for FMD and disposal sites from 29 October 2010, the first day of the big outbreak to August 2016. We found that the Korean response to the FMD outbreak originated from political purposes. We present four rationales for our arguments including: (1) a military collision between North and South of Korea; (2) the reformation of four big rivers; (3) the incident at the Fukushima Atomic Energy Plant of Japan; and (4) the national elections. We believe that the next response should be based on scientific data and proof, and also from the environmental perspective, not the political or industry perspective.

Keywords: foot-and-mouth disease; FMD; disposal site; Korea; political response; news review (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/3/463/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/3/463/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:3:p:463-:d:93531

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().