EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Policies for Reintegrating Crop and Livestock Systems: A Comparative Analysis

Rachael D. Garrett (), Meredith Niles (), Juliana Gil (), Philip Dy (), Julio Reis () and Judson Valentim ()
Additional contact information
Rachael D. Garrett: Department of Earth and Environment, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA
Meredith Niles: Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
Juliana Gil: Department of Earth and Environment, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA
Philip Dy: Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
Julio Reis: Embrapa Agrossilvopastoral, Sinop 78550-970, MT, Brazil
Judson Valentim: Agroforestry Research Center of Acre, Embrapa, Rio Branco 69900-970, AC, Brazil

Sustainability, 2017, vol. 9, issue 3, 1-22

Abstract: The reintegration of crop and livestock systems within the same land area has the potential to improve soil quality and reduce water and air pollution, while maintaining high yields and reducing risk. In this study, we characterize the degree to which federal policies in three major global food production regions that span a range of socioeconomic contexts, Brazil, New Zealand, and the United States, incentivize or disincentivize the use of integrated crop and livestock practices (ICLS). Our analysis indicates that Brazil and New Zealand have the most favorable policy environment for ICLS, while the United States provides the least favorable environment. The balance of policy incentives and disincentives across our three cases studies mirrors current patterns of ICLS usage. Brazil and New Zealand have both undergone a trend toward mixed crop livestock systems in recent years, while the United States has transitioned rapidly toward continuous crop and livestock production. If transitions to ICLS are desired, particularly in the United States, it will be necessary to change agricultural, trade, environmental, biofuels, and food safety policies that currently buffer farmers from risk, provide too few incentives for pollution reduction, and restrict the presence of animals in crop areas. It will also be necessary to invest more in research and development in all countries to identify the most profitable ICLS technologies in each region.

Keywords: sustainable agriculture; agroecology; United States; New Zealand; Brazil (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 O13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/3/473/pdf (application/pdf)
http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/3/473/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:3:p:473-:d:93752

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Prof. Dr. Marc A. Rosen

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI, Open Access Journal
Series data maintained by XML Conversion Team ().

 
Page updated 2018-01-12
Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:3:p:473-:d:93752