Comparative LCA of Alternative Scenarios for Waste Treatment: The Case of Food Waste Production by the Mass-Retail Sector

Giovanni Mondello, Roberta Salomone, Giuseppe Ioppolo, Giuseppe Saija, Sergio Sparacia and Maria Claudia Lucchetti
Additional contact information
Giovanni Mondello: Department of Business Studies, University of Roma Tre, Via Silvio D’Amico n. 77, 00145 Rome, Italy
Roberta Salomone: Department of Economics, University of Messina, Piazza Pugliatti n.1, 98122 Messina, Italy
Giuseppe Ioppolo: Department of Economics, University of Messina, Piazza Pugliatti n.1, 98122 Messina, Italy
Giuseppe Saija: Department of Economics, University of Messina, Piazza Pugliatti n.1, 98122 Messina, Italy
Sergio Sparacia: Department of Economics, Business and Statistics Science, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy
Maria Claudia Lucchetti: Department of Business Studies, University of Roma Tre, Via Silvio D’Amico n. 77, 00145 Rome, Italy

Sustainability, 2017, vol. 9, issue 5, 1-18

Abstract: Food waste is one of the most important issues taken into account by the European Union due to its negative environmental, economic and social impacts. The treatment of food waste through recycling processes represents a solution for food waste minimisation. Concerning, in particular, the retail sector, it is necessary to define strategies for retail-oriented sustainable food waste management. The aim of this study is to compare the potential environmental impacts related to five scenarios (landfill, incineration, composting, anaerobic digestion and bioconversion through insects) for the disposal/treatment of food waste produced by a mass retail company operating in Messina (Italy) through the application of the Life Cycle Assessment method, in order to find the best treatment solution. Results based on the treatment of a functional unit of 1 tonne of food waste show that the bioconversion scenario represents the most preferable solution considering all of the impact categories analysed through the CML 2 baseline 2000 method, except for Global Warming, for which higher environmental performances are connected to the anaerobic digestion scenario. The incineration and the bioconversion scenarios show the highest environmental benefits when the production of alternative energy sources and valuable materials is evaluated through the inclusion of the avoided productions in the analysis.

Keywords: food waste; Life Cycle Assessment; mass-retail; supermarkets; alternative scenarios; landfill; incineration; composting; biogas; bioconversion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/5/827/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/5/827/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:5:p:827-:d:98702

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().