Ecosystem Services as a Boundary Concept: Arguments from Social Ecology

Christian Schleyer, Alexandra Lux, Marion Mehring and Christoph Görg
Additional contact information
Christian Schleyer: Section of International Agricultural Policy and Environmental Governance, University of Kassel, 37213 Witzenhausen, Germany
Alexandra Lux: ISOE—Institute for Social-Ecological Research, Transdisciplinary Methods and Concepts, 60486 Frankfurt/M., Germany
Marion Mehring: Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F), 60325 Frankfurt/M., Germany
Christoph Görg: Institute of Social Ecology, 1070 Vienna, Alpen-Adria University, 9020 Klagenfurt, Austria

Sustainability, 2017, vol. 9, issue 7, 1-14

Abstract: Ecosystem services (ES) are defined as the interdependencies between society and nature. Despite several years of conceptual discussions, some challenges of the ES concept are far from being resolved. In particular, the usefulness of the concept for nature protection is questioned, and a strong critique is expressed concerning its contribution towards the neoliberal commodification of nature. This paper argues that these challenges can be addressed by dealing more carefully with ES as a boundary concept between different disciplines and between science and society. ES are neither about nature nor about human wellbeing, but about the mutual dependencies between nature and human wellbeing. These mutual interdependencies, however, create tensions and contradictions that manifest themselves in the boundary negotiations between different scientific disciplines and between science and society. This paper shows that approaches from Social Ecology can address these boundary negotiations and the power relations involved more explicitly. Finally, this implies the urgent need for more inter- and transdisciplinary collaboration in ES research. We conclude (1) that the social–ecological nature of ES must be elaborated more carefully while explicitly focussing on the interdependencies between nature and society; (2) to better implement inter- and transdisciplinary methods into ES research; and (3) that such ES research can—and to some extent already does—substantially enhance international research programmes such as Future Earth.

Keywords: ecosystem services; social–ecological systems; social ecology; transdisciplinary research; interdisciplinary research; colonisation; boundary concept (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/7/1107/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/7/1107/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:7:p:1107-:d:102606

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().