An Analysis of the Most Adopted Rating Systems for Assessing the Environmental Impact of Buildings

Elena Bernardi, Salvatore Carlucci, Cristina Cornaro and Rolf André Bohne
Additional contact information
Elena Bernardi: Department for Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
Salvatore Carlucci: Department for Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
Cristina Cornaro: Department of Enterprise Engineering, University of Rome ‘Tor Vergata’, 00133 Rome, Italy
Rolf André Bohne: Department for Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, 7491 Trondheim, Norway

Sustainability, 2017, vol. 9, issue 7, 1-27

Abstract: Rating systems for assessing the environmental impact of buildings are technical instruments that aim to evaluate the environmental impact of buildings and construction projects. In some cases, these rating systems can also cover urban-scale projects, community projects, and infrastructures. These schemes are designed to assist project management in making the projects more sustainable by providing frameworks with precise criteria for assessing the various aspects of a building’s environmental impact. Given the growing interest in sustainable development worldwide, many rating systems for assessing the environmental impact of buildings have been established in recent years, each one with its peculiarities and fields of applicability. The present work is motivated by an interest in emphasizing such differences to better understand these rating systems and extract the main implications to building design. It also attempts to summarize in a user-friendly form the vast and fragmented assortment of information that is available today. The analysis focuses on the six main rating systems: the Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Methodology (BREEAM), the Comprehensive Assessment System for Built Environment Efficiency (CASBEE), the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nachhaltiges Bauen (DGNB), the Haute Qualité Environnementale (HQE TM ), the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), and the Sustainable Building Tool (SBTool).

Keywords: rating systems; building environmental impact; sustainability; BREEAM; CASBEE; DGNB; HQE; LEED; SBTool (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O13 Q Q0 Q2 Q3 Q5 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (31)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/7/1226/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/7/1226/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:7:p:1226-:d:104575

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainability is currently edited by Ms. Alexandra Wu

More articles in Sustainability from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().