Particle Size Distribution of Materials and Chemical Element Composition in Mixed Commercial Waste

Maximilian Julius Enengel (), Tatjana Lasch, Lisa Kandlbauer, Sandra Antonia Viczek, Roland Pomberger and Renato Sarc
Additional contact information
Maximilian Julius Enengel: Chair of Waste Processing Technology and Waste Management, Department of Environmental and Energy Process Engineering, Montanuniversität Leoben, 8700 Leoben, Austria
Tatjana Lasch: Chair of Process Technology and Industrial Environmental Protection, Department of Environmental and Energy Process Engineering, Montanuniversitaet Leoben, Franz-Josef-Strasse 18, 8700 Leoben, Austria
Lisa Kandlbauer: Chair of Waste Processing Technology and Waste Management, Department of Environmental and Energy Process Engineering, Montanuniversität Leoben, 8700 Leoben, Austria
Sandra Antonia Viczek: Chair of Waste Processing Technology and Waste Management, Department of Environmental and Energy Process Engineering, Montanuniversität Leoben, 8700 Leoben, Austria
Roland Pomberger: Chair of Waste Processing Technology and Waste Management, Department of Environmental and Energy Process Engineering, Montanuniversität Leoben, 8700 Leoben, Austria
Renato Sarc: Chair of Waste Processing Technology and Waste Management, Department of Environmental and Energy Process Engineering, Montanuniversität Leoben, 8700 Leoben, Austria

Waste, 2025, vol. 3, issue 1, 1-15

Abstract: In processing mixed commercial waste (MCW), particle size distribution is as critical as material composition. Detailed knowledge of particle size distribution unlocks the recycling potential of specific material groups and facilitates the efficient conversion of these materials into secondary fuels. Additionally, understanding particle size-dependent element distribution in waste is crucial, particularly given potential legal limits on several heavy metals. While two studies carried out in 2019 have addressed these issues, the inherent variability in MCW composition necessitates further investigation to validate and expand upon these findings. In this study, ten representative samples of MCW were collected and screened with eight screen cuts (200 mm, 100 mm, 80 mm, 60 mm, 40 mm, 20 mm, 10 mm, 5 mm). Six of these fractions (>20 mm) were sorted into 37 material classes, combined again by particle size, and subjected to chemical analyses. These analyses included essential fuel parameters, such as lower heating value and biogenic carbon content, and the concentration of 35 elements across all particle size fractions. A Mann–Whitney U test was conducted to identify correlations in element concentrations between the present study and the study carried out in 2019. Although the results confirm considerable variability in MCW composition, they also reveal trends in element concentrations related to calorific value.

Keywords: waste analysis; element concentration; heavy metals; fuel parameters; biogenic content; waste screening; manual sorting; recycling potential; black material composition (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Q1 Q16 Q18 Q2 Q20 Q23 Q24 Q25 Q28 Q3 Q31 Q38 Q5 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2813-0391/3/1/9/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2813-0391/3/1/9/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jwaste:v:3:y:2025:i:1:p:9-:d:1599085

Access Statistics for this article

Waste is currently edited by Mr. Sumail Li

More articles in Waste from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().