Utility of Certain AI Models in Climate-Induced Disasters

Ritusnata Mishra (), Sanjeev Kumar, Himangshu Sarkar and Chandra Shekhar Prasad Ojha
Additional contact information
Ritusnata Mishra: Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee 247667, India
Sanjeev Kumar: Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee 247667, India
Himangshu Sarkar: Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee 247667, India
Chandra Shekhar Prasad Ojha: Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee 247667, India

World, 2024, vol. 5, issue 4, 1-36

Abstract: To address the current challenge of climate change at the local and global levels, this article discusses a few important water resources engineering topics, such as estimating the energy dissipation of flowing waters over hilly areas through the provision of regulated stepped channels, predicting the removal of silt deposition in the irrigation canal, and predicting groundwater level. Artificial intelligence (AI) in water resource engineering is now one of the most active study topics. As a result, multiple AI tools such as Random Forest (RF), Random Tree (RT), M5P (M5 model trees), M5Rules, Feed-Forward Neural Networks (FFNNs), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), and Support Vector Machines kernel-based model (SVM-Pearson VII Universal Kernel, Radial Basis Function) are tested in the present study using various combinations of datasets. However, in various circumstances, including predicting energy dissipation of stepped channels and silt deposition in rivers, AI techniques outperformed the traditional approach in the literature. Out of all the models, the GBM model performed better than other AI tools in both the field of energy dissipation of stepped channels with a coefficient of determination (R 2 ) of 0.998, root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.00182, and mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.0016 and sediment trapping efficiency of vortex tube ejector with an R 2 of 0.997, RMSE of 0.769, and MAE of 0.531 during testing. On the other hand, the AI technique could not adequately understand the diversity in groundwater level datasets using field data from various stations. According to the current study, the AI tool works well in some fields of water resource engineering, but it has difficulty in other domains in capturing the diversity of datasets.

Keywords: AI application; energy dissipation; stepped channel; sediment removal; trapping efficiency of vortex tube ejector; groundwater level (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G15 G17 G18 L21 L22 L25 L26 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 R51 R52 R58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/5/4/45/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/5/4/45/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jworld:v:5:y:2024:i:4:p:45-900:d:1494176

Access Statistics for this article

World is currently edited by Ms. Cassie Hu

More articles in World from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().