Emerging Markets’ Carbon Pricing Development: A Comparative Analysis of China and South Korea’s Experience

Yoo Kee Law and Chng Saun Fong ()
Additional contact information
Yoo Kee Law: Institute for Advanced Studies, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
Chng Saun Fong: Institute for Advanced Studies, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia

World, 2025, vol. 6, issue 2, 1-27

Abstract: The transition to low-carbon economies presents unique challenges for emerging markets, particularly in developing effective carbon pricing mechanisms that balance environmental objectives with economic development needs. This study examines the ratio legis of carbon pricing policies through a comparative analysis of China and South Korea’s established systems, utilizing the FASTER (Fairness, Alignment, Stability, Transparency, Economic efficiency, Reliability) principles evaluation framework. Using qualitative doctrinal methodology integrated and comparative policy analysis legislative frameworks and market data from 2015–2023, this paper examines Malaysia as a representative case study wherein carbon market initiatives remain in voluntary phase with approximately 150,000 carbon credits traded. The comparative results demonstrate that a choice between China’s intensity-based approach and South Korea’s absolute cap system should be guided by the following: (1) development stage, with industrializing economies benefiting from China’s flexible model; (2) institutional capacity, where limited monitoring capabilities favor phased approaches; (3) economic structure, with emissions-intensive economies requiring growth-accommodating systems; (4) policy landscape complexity; and (5) market size. The research proposes a structured implementation framework for emerging markets, demonstrated through Malaysia’s context, that enables effective emission reduction while maintaining economic competitiveness during the transition to low-carbon economies.

Keywords: carbon pricing; emissions trading system; emerging markets; sustainable development; FASTER principle; local adaptation; comparative analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G15 G17 G18 L21 L22 L25 L26 Q42 Q43 Q47 Q48 R51 R52 R58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/6/2/58/pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4060/6/2/58/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gam:jworld:v:6:y:2025:i:2:p:58-:d:1648308

Access Statistics for this article

World is currently edited by Ms. Cassie Hu

More articles in World from MDPI
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MDPI Indexing Manager ().