Voters’ Sentiment and Propensity to Vote in The Wake of Internal Squabbling in Election Management Bodies: The Case of Ghana’s Electoral Commission

Henry Kyeremeh () and Bordalo Mouzinho ()

Global Politics Review, 2018, vol. 4, issue 1, 31-58

Abstract: The paper explores the implications of the alleged administrative infractions at Ghana’s Electoral Commission. We combine qualitative and quantitative approaches to address the issue as follows. First, we employ machine learning techniques to express the sentiment of Ghanaians towards the Commission using Facebook comments from different public sources. Second, we use data from an online survey to examine the propensity of Ghanaians to vote in future elections. The sentiment analysis allowed for the comparison of favourable, unfavourable and neutral Facebook comments and showed that 40 percent of comments were unfavourable whereas the neutral and favourable accounted for 27 and 33 percent respectively. However, the quantitative analysis showed that those respondents who see the Commission as the reason for the previous peaceful elections have a significant and positive propensity to vote in 2020 elections. Similarly, those respondents who see magnanimity of the Ghanaian as the reason for the many peaceful polls are more likely to vote in 2020 elections. It is worth noting, however, that the redeeming of the image of the Commission is imperative as the impasse has dwindled public faith in the Commission significantly.

Keywords: Ghana; Electoral Commission; Sentiment Analysis; Facebook; Perception; Voting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: Y8 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.globalpoliticsreview.com/2464-9929_v04_i01_p031/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:gpr:journl:v:4:y:2018:i:1:p:31-58

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Global Politics Review from Global Politics Review
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().