Sovereign AI, National Strategy Divergence, and the Investment Outlook

Olaniyi Evans

Hequation Review, 2026, vol. 2, issue 2, 1-6

Abstract: The emergence of sovereign AI as a formal state priority marks a structural turn in how nations position themselves within global technology competition. This paper examines four contemporary policy developments: South Korea's AI Basic Act (effective January 2026), Japan's Generative AI Principle Code (public consultation, January 2026), Rwanda's National AI Policy, and the ECLAC-CENIA Latin American AI Index (ILIA 2025). Applying a comparative governance lens, the analysis identifies three regulatory models: statutory risk-based regulation, soft-law compliance frameworks, and developmental AI strategy. Investment implications specific to each model are drawn out, with attention to regulatory divergence, compliance costs, and capital allocation signals.

Keywords: Sovereign AI; national AI strategy; regulatory divergence; AI governance; investment readiness (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K23 L86 O33 O38 O55 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.32389914 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:heq:heqrev:v2y2026i2a1

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Hequation Review from Hequation
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Olaniyi Evans ().