Russian Migration Liberalization in 2007–2008: Lower Wages and Other Consequences
Sergey Onenko and
Additional contact information
Sergey Onenko: National Research University Higher School of Economics, Saint Petersburg, Russia
HSE Economic Journal, 2017, vol. 21, issue 4, 648-679
We explore the noticeable liberalization of Russian labor migration 2007–2008, as a natural experiment. How did it influence the labor market equilibrium and especially the wages of certain categories of Russian employees? We use various data, including remittances from Russia, and restore related increase in official and unofficial labor migration. According to our estimate, the number of migrant workers increased significantly, from 3,3 million in 2006 to 4,2 million (2007) and then to 4,55 million (2008). This did not cause additional unemployment, but did influence wages. We follow Borjas’s method of assessing the impact of natural experiments, and we are interested in equilibrium wage elasticities and the interdependencies among labor groups in Russia. To reveal the elasticity of equilibrium wages responding to 2007–2008 inflow of (mostly unskilled) labor, we run difference-in-difference regressions on RLMS data. For some Russian residents, their wages responded noticeably to new policy. The most affected were pre-established Asian migrants: they lost 14–17,5% wages in response to the 8%–14% increase in the migrant work force. Blue collar ethnic Russians or those with low qualifications lost about 4,5–5,5% of their wages, while the impact on white-collar workers was insignificant. The macro-economic consequences of such liberalization policies for Russia, include losses for some categories of employees, which can be compared with additional GDP generated.
Keywords: international labor; Russia; migration policy; labor mobility; wages; employment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J31 J61 J68 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hig:ecohse:2017:4:6
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in HSE Economic Journal from National Research University Higher School of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Editorial board () and Editorial board ().