EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Determinants of Foreign Technological Activity in German Regions - A Count Model Analysis of Transnational Patents

Eva Dettmann (), Iciar Dominguez Lacasa (), Jutta Guenther () and Bjoern Jindra ()
Additional contact information
Jutta Guenther: Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH-Halle), Germany, and Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany

Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Jutta Günther ()

Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), 2014, vol. 8, issue 1, 34-51

Abstract: Most research on R&D internationalisation focuses on comparative analysis of location factors at the national level of analysis. Very little work, however, has taken place in this field for the sub-national regional location behavior of multi-national enterprises (MNE). The paper contributes to the existing research by providing evidence on the determinants of foreign technological activities at the sub-national level for Germany, which hosts the largest share of foreign R&D within the EU27 and features the highest cross-regional dispersion of patented research. Using a pooled count data model, we estimate the effect of various sources for externalities on the extent of foreign technological activity across regions. Particular attention is paid to the role of local knowledge spillovers, technological specialization and diversification. We differentiate foreign and domestic sources of specialisation and account for region and sector-specific influences. This is the first time that the ‘cross-border-ownership’ principle to measure R&D internationalisation is combined with regionalised patent information. To verify our findings we develop hypotheses. In particular, we expect and find that foreign technological activity is attracted by technologically specialised sectors of regions. In contrast to current empirical work, this effect applies both to foreign as well as domestic sources of specialization, although effects on foreign specialization seem more significant. We expect and find the same for science-industry spillovers. We postulate a negative impact of domestic specialization on foreign technological activities and a strong positive effect from diversification spillovers, by comparison with specialisation spillovers, but these hypotheses are rejected. We find that the direction of the specialisation effect depends on dominance in the position of domestic firms as well as on the balance of knowledge flows between them and foreign actors. Note: Downloadable document is in Russian.

Keywords: R&D internationalisation; knowledge spillovers; specialisation externalities; cross-border patent ownership; patent statistics; technological specialisation; domestic specialisation; foreign specialisation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O32 O34 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://foresight-journal.hse.ru/data/2014/03/28/1 ... 0%B5%D1%80-34-51.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hig:fsight:v:8:y:2014:i:1:p:34-51

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015) from National Research University Higher School of Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Nataliya Gavrilicheva () and Mikhail Salazkin ().

 
Page updated 2022-12-19
Handle: RePEc:hig:fsight:v:8:y:2014:i:1:p:34-51