Comparative Study of Finite Difference and Finite Element Methods for Solving 2D Parabolic Convection–Diffusion–Reaction Equations With Variable Coefficients

Endalew Getnet Tsega

International Journal of Differential Equations, 2025, vol. 2025, 1-16

Abstract: This study investigates the numerical solution of two-dimensional parabolic convection–diffusion–reaction (CDR) equations with variable coefficients using the finite difference method (FDM) and the finite element method (FEM). The FDM employs central differences for spatial discretization and the implicit Euler method for time integration, while the FEM uses the Galerkin approach with rectangular elements and three-point Gauss–Legendre quadrature for spatial integrals, followed by implicit Euler discretization in time. Three test problems are considered to compare accuracy and efficiency. For small diffusion coefficients, the FEM provides higher accuracy, whereas for larger diffusion coefficients, both methods deliver nearly identical accuracy. Despite its improved accuracy in certain cases, the FEM typically involves a higher computational cost than the FDM. Based on the results, the study recommends the use of FEM for problems with boundary or interior layers.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/ijde/2025/2126609.pdf (application/pdf)
http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/ijde/2025/2126609.xml (application/xml)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hin:jnijde:2126609

DOI: 10.1155/ijde/2126609

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Differential Equations from Hindawi
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mohamed Abdelhakeem ().