Development and Evaluation of the Reliability and Validity of Video-Based Assessment Checklists of Nursing Skills via Chest-Mounted Cameras for Home-Visiting Nurses

Sotaro Shimada, Toshiaki Takahashi, Aya Kitamura, Masaru Matsumoto, Yuko Mugita, Hiromi Sanada and Gojiro Nakagami

Nursing Research and Practice, 2025, vol. 2025, 1-12

Abstract: IntroductionEnsuring that home-visiting nurses (HVNs) possess adequate skills for providing appropriate care is crucial in the context of increasing service demand with advanced care needs. However, current quality assurance relies on mentors’ subjective assessments during accompanying visits, which are burdensome and rater-dependent. This study aimed to develop and evaluate the inter- and intrarater reliability and concurrent validity of objective video-based assessment (VBA) checklists for HVNs’ nursing skills, focusing on peripheral intravenous catheter placement, pressure injury care, defecation care, and skin tear care to reduce the burden of skill assessment at home and ensure valid skill assessments.MethodsThe checklists were developed through a literature review, focus group interviews, and a group meeting using the nominal group technique to ensure content validity. The inter- and intrarater reliabilities and concurrent validity of the checklists were evaluated using videos of nurses providing care to simulated patients. Five nursing researchers with experience in mentoring nurses assessed the videos twice using checklists with a washout period. The inter- and intrarater reliabilities were analyzed using Gwet’s AC1 statistics. Concurrent validity was evaluated with sensitivity and specificity of assessment using checklists against raters’ subjective assessments, with expertise in nursing skills as the gold standard.ResultsThe checklists demonstrated substantial to almost perfect inter- and intrarater reliabilities (AC1: 0.63–1.00) for each item. The overall assessments also showed more than substantial inter- and intrarater reliabilities (AC1: 0.72–1.00). The sensitivity and specificity of the checklists were both above 0.90, indicating high concurrent validity.ConclusionThe checklists were reliable and valid for objectively assessing HVNs’ skills. The VBA suggests feasible and cost-effective methods for quality assurance, potentially improving the quality of home care. Further studies with patients in diverse clinical settings are required to enhance the generalizability of the results.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/nrp/2025/7893018.pdf (application/pdf)
http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/nrp/2025/7893018.xml (application/xml)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hin:jnlnrp:7893018

DOI: 10.1155/nrp/7893018

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Nursing Research and Practice from Hindawi
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mohamed Abdelhakeem ().