The State and Two Revolutions: A Porperian Perspective

Michael Keren

Homo Oeconomicus, 2004, vol. 21, 197-224

Abstract: Popper, in his Open Society and The Poverty of Historicism argued that planned institutional social changes may be successful, provided their architects know the structure of the relevant institutions and their interrelations and plan and execute their changes accordingly. The changes discussed in this paper are the two revolutions, the Communist one in 1917 and the one that ended the socialist economic system in the 1990s. The contention of this paper is that both failed because their architects did not and could not be aware of the pivotal role of state in the economic system, which was not known at the time of the revolutions.

Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hom:homoec:v:21:y:2004:p:197-224

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Homo Oeconomicus from Institute of SocioEconomics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().