Decentralization and Development Outcomes: What Does the Empirical Literature Really Say?
Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, 2021, vol. 237, issue 2, 111-151
This article critically reviews the empirical literature on decentralization and its relationship with development outcomes. The analysis suggests that revenue decentralization and fscal independence, or the ability of local governments to raise their own revenue rather than relying on transfers from the national government, are the decentralization types most positively associated with development outcomes. Expenditure decentralization has no clear trend. In terms of development outcomes, most of the studies reviewed found evidence that good governance is positively associated with decentralization; but the evidence is mixed on economic growth. Some suggestions were also made for future decentralization studies
Keywords: Decentralization; Development; Literature Survey (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H70 H77 I30 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://hpe-rpe.org/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?juwpfi ... eff1bdf046&preview=1 (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hpe:journl:y:2021:v:237:i:2:p:111-151
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics from IEF Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Miguel Gómez de Antonio ().