Workload Analysis Teachers in Development Education (Case Studies Teachers in Junior High School District of Pamatang Sidamanik)
Corry
International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2015, vol. 5, issue 1, 399-411
Abstract:
The decision to accept the division of teaching other subjects are not based on a sense of moral responsibility as a professional teacher. In order to improve the quality of Education if there is a teacher who teach various subjects. When teachers teach the subject matter is not the subject they teach the learning process that takes place may be bad, because the teacher is no longer the focus on the subject matter into the field. The focus of the problem in this research is to be answered in this study, the subsequent formulation of the problem or research question is the following is the extent to which the amount of the workload of teachers make a positive contribution in the development of education. By using qualitative research methodology is because the data collected and the analysis is qualitative. Qualitative research requires information into to the level of significance. Qualitative studies further emphasize the significance of the generalization. Source of data in this research is the source of the data is a source of primary data that has not been certified teachers, and who have been certified either already getting benefits or not professional educators, and principals in Junior High School in the District Pamatang Sidamanik. It is still to be between 24-40 hours per week. So it can be explained that all teachers, amounting to 9 people in the Junior High School 2 Pamatang Sidamanik workload gets a minimum of 24 hours of face to face, the ideal study group is 4 and the structure of the curriculum already plus a maximum of 4 les, where one person as the head of the school, which calculated with a load equivalent to 18 hours of work face to face, and 4 among the received additional duties as Assistant principals with the workload of each equivalent to 12 hours of face to face and one of them as head of the library with the workload equivalent to 12 hours of face to face. This calculation is correct when allowed teachers to teach not only the subject areas taught.
Date: 2015
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hrmars.com/hrmars_papers/Workload_Analysis_ ... opment_Education.pdf (application/pdf)
http://hrmars.com/hrmars_papers/Workload_Analysis_ ... opment_Education.pdf (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hur:ijarbs:v:5:y:2015:i:1:p:399-411
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences from Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Hassan Danial Aslam ().