Setting up social experiments: the good, the bad, and the ugly

Burt S. Barnow
Additional contact information
Burt S. Barnow: George Washington University, Trachtenberg School of Public Policy and Public Administration, Washington, DC, USA

Zeitschrift für ArbeitsmarktForschung - Journal for Labour Market Research, 2010, vol. 43, issue 2, 91-105

Abstract: "It is widely agreed that randomized controlled trials - social experiments - are the gold standard for evaluating social programs. There are, however, many important issues that cannot be tested using social experiments, and often things go wrong when conducting social experiments. This paper explores these issues and offers suggestions on ways to deal with commonly encountered problems. Social experiments are preferred because random assignment assures that any differences between the treatment and control groups are due to the intervention and not some other factor; also, the results of social experiments are more easily explained and accepted by policy officials. Experimental evaluations often lack external validity and cannot control for entry effects, scale and general equilibrium effects, and aspects of the intervention that were not randomly assigned. Experiments can also lead to biased impact estimates if the control group changes its behavior or if changing the number selected changes the impact. Other problems with conducting social experiments include increased time and cost, and legal and ethical issues related to excluding people from the treatment. Things that sometimes go wrong in social experiments include programs cheating on random assignment, and participants and/or staff not understanding the intervention rules. The random assignment evaluation of the Job Training Partnership Act in the United States is used as a case study to illustrate the issues." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))

Keywords: USA; Erfolgskontrolle; Experiment; Methodologie; Stichprobenfehler; Stichprobenverfahren; arbeitsmarktpolitische Maßnahme; Wirkungsforschung; wissenschaftliche Begleitung (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12651-010-0042-6

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iab:iabzaf:v:43:i:2:p:091-105

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ilsPage=subscription

DOI: 10.1007/s12651-010-0042-6

Access Statistics for this article

Zeitschrift für ArbeitsmarktForschung - Journal for Labour Market Research is currently edited by Joachim Möller et al.

More articles in Zeitschrift für ArbeitsmarktForschung - Journal for Labour Market Research from Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany] Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by IAB, Geschäftsbereich Wissenschaftliche Fachinformation und Bibliothek ().