 DIRECTORS’ AND OFFICERS’ INSURANCE AND OPPORTUNISM IN ACCOUNTING CHOICEIrene Kim Accounting & Taxation, 2015, vol. 7, issue 1, 51-65 Abstract: In this paper, the focus is on how excessive directors’ and officers’ liability insurance coverage is associated with risk-taking behavior in financial reporting. This study examines the implications of two alternative hypotheses. The opportunism hypothesis predicts that the covered executive is overly buffered from recourse via securities litigation, which leads to aggressive accounting choices. The alternative hypothesis is the economic insurance hypothesis which predicts that firms will over-invest in directors’ and officers’ liability insurance coverage independent of their aptitude for accounting manipulation because of the managers’ risk aversion. Aggressive accounting is measured using regulatory accounting enforcement actions and earnings restatements. I find evidence consistent with the opportunism hypothesis in both the enforcement action and restatement setting, suggesting that officers rely on excessive insurance in making financial reporting decisions. The findings have implications for managerial private information and its impact on financial reporting decisions. Keywords: Earnings Quality; Litigation; Insurance (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ibf:acttax:v:7:y:2015:i:1:p:51-65 Access Statistics for this article Accounting & Taxation is currently edited by Terrance Jalbert More articles in Accounting & Taxation from The Institute for Business and Finance Research |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.