COMPARING LEARNING OUTCOMES ON FACE-TOFACE AND ONLINE TEACHING PLATFORMS: EVIDENCE FROM MAJOR FIELD TEST SCORES

Michael F. Toyne, James E. Briley and Terrance Jalbert

Business Education and Accreditation, 2019, vol. 11, issue 1, 61-69

Abstract: Online instruction is becoming an increasingly popular course delivery system. This paper examines performance outcomes of finance students receiving face-to-face instruction versus online instruction. We compare the Educational Testing Service Major Field Test (ETS) finance sub-scores of students enrolled in online sections of Principles of Finance with those enrolled in face to face sections over a three-semester period. Results show no evidence of performance differences between online and face to face students

Keywords: ETS; Online versus Face-to-Face Courses; Educational Testing Service Major Field Exam (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A20 A22 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.theibfr2.com/RePEc/ibf/beaccr/bea-v11n1-2019/BEA-V11N1-2019-5.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ibf:beaccr:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:61-69

Access Statistics for this article

Business Education and Accreditation is currently edited by Terrance Jalbert

More articles in Business Education and Accreditation from The Institute for Business and Finance Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mercedes Jalbert ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).