Economics at your fingertips  


Jeffry Haber

Global Journal of Business Research, 2019, vol. 13, issue 2, 95-105

Abstract: There is a long-standing debate about whether active investment management can outperform a passive benchmark, usually expressed as an index. The debate is usually considered on the manager-level, comparing the active management return of a particular manager against an appropriate index. This paper looks at the topic on a portfolio level. Using the average asset allocation of a large, private foundation, this paper replaces managers with exchange traded funds that invest in a similar strategy. For 2017 the average portfolio return of the average, large private foundation (the actively managed portfolio) produced an average return of 14.3% compared to the portfolio comprised of exchange traded funds (the passively managed portfolio) produced a return of 11.9%. The active portfolio outperformed the exchange traded fund portfolio across every broad asset class

Keywords: Active Investing; Passive Investing; ETFs; Active Versus Passive Investing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Access Statistics for this article

Global Journal of Business Research is currently edited by Terrance Jalbert

More articles in Global Journal of Business Research from The Institute for Business and Finance Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mercedes Jalbert ().

Page updated 2019-10-12
Handle: RePEc:ibf:gjbres:v:13:y:2019:i:2:p:95-105