 A Study of Moral Decision-Making: Business Majors Versus Non-Business MajorsA. S. MacKewn and K. W. VanVuren Global Journal of Business Research, 2007, vol. 1, issue 1, 139-146 Abstract: In the field of psychology there is a theory of ethical grounding that distinguishes between people on the basis of idealism versus relativism. An idealistic person is one who believes in absolute truths, values, and rules. A relativistic person, on the other hand, believes that truth is relative to some context; and for them there are no, nor should there be, any absolute values or rigid ethical rules of conduct. This study surveyed undergraduate business and non-business students at a mid-sized southern university to examine whether business majors differed from non-business majors on idealism/relativism and moral decision-making. This research question has important implications not only for pedagogical purposes but also practical implications in the hiring of persons by employers. The results of the study produced evidence that on theoretical terms business students are more relativistic than non-business students but when presented with practical real-world situations in which to apply relativistic thinking, the two groups were not significantly different. Date: 2007 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ibf:gjbres:v:1:y:2007:i:1:p:139-146 Access Statistics for this article Global Journal of Business Research is currently edited by Terrance Jalbert More articles in Global Journal of Business Research from The Institute for Business and Finance Research |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.