EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Assessment of the Maya’s Beliefs and Preferences on Bonesetters and Bone Fracture Treatment in the Guatemalan Highlands: A Household Survey

Bennett W. Hartley and Craig A. Sinkinson

Global Journal of Health Science, 2021, vol. 13, issue 3, 89

Abstract: BACKGROUND- In the Lake Atitlán region of Guatemala, traditional bonesetters (hueseros) commonly treat bone fractures. The indigenous Kaqchikel population has access to biomedical care, but traditional medicine remains the preferred treatment modality for bone fracture. METHODS- Households in four villages were surveyed to assess experiences with bone fracture treatment. Of 108 households sampled, 83 met inclusion criteria and completed the survey. Responses were analyzed to assess for group demographics, bone fracture prevalence, and treatment history. Independence testing assessed for subgroup differences. RESULTS- Mean age- 40 years old. For fracture treatment, 37% (31/83) consulted with a physician/nurse whereas 75% (62/83) consulted with a bonesetter. 19% (16/83) consulted with both. Cast immobilization was utilized by only 16% (13/83) of participants. The services provided by bonesetters included massage, temazcal (sweat lodge), herbal poultice, prayer, and recommended rest. When comparing participants that used a cast (n=13) and those that used a bonesetter exclusively (n=46), the bonesetter group had lower rates of continued pain and movement limitation, higher satisfaction with treatment, and higher interest in seeking the same treatment in the future, though these findings were not statistically significant. Regarding future care, 66% (55/83) would consider consulting a doctor whereas 83% (69/83) would seek services from a bonesetter. 53% (44/83) would utilize both. If recommended, 46% (38/83) would consider using a cast. Only 22% (18/83) of participants reported previous musculoskeletal imaging. CONCLUSION- These results suggest a high preference of bonesetters for bone injury treatment, reduced acceptance of biomedical care, and limited acceptance of cast immobilization.

Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/download/0/0/44738/47274 (application/pdf)
http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/view/0/44738 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:89

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Global Journal of Health Science from Canadian Center of Science and Education Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Canadian Center of Science and Education ().

 
Page updated 2021-06-17
Handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:89