EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Efficacy of Antimicrobial Lock Solutionsagainst Catheter-Related Infections in Hemodialysis Patients

Maria Skoulatou, Victoria Alikari, Georgia Toulia, Anna Kavga, Ourania Govina, Dimitra Siopi, Irene Zormba, Christina Skoulatou and Georgia Gerogianni

Global Journal of Health Science, 2021, vol. 13, issue 4, 72

Abstract: INTRODUCTION- Hemodialysis patientsare at increased risk of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) and catheter thrombosis asdialysis requires regular access to blood circulation through catheters. Antimicrobial Locking Solutions (ALS) containing anticoagulants and antimicrobial agents (antibiotic/non-antibiotic) are used to seal catheters in order to prevent thrombosis and CRBSI. PURPOSE- The investigation of internationalclinical studies regarding the efficacy and safety of the various ALS treatments for CRBSI in hemodialysis patients (HD patients) comparing to conventional approaches such as heparin treatment or catheter removal. METHODOLOGY- The review included prospective or retrospective clinical studies, randomized clinical trials or cohort studies published since 2015. Publications were retrieved from the “Pubmed”, “Google Scholar” and “Elsevier” databases using ‘catheter’, ‘catheter removal’, ‘hemodialysis’ ‘bacteremia’, ‘antimicrobial lock therapy’as key words. RESULTS- 17 articles were found to meet the criteria for this systematic review. These studies investigated locking solutions containing various antibiotic (Cefazolin, Gentamicin, Vancomycin, Cotrimoxazole, Daptomycin, Trimethoprim) or/and non-antibiotic agents (Citrate, taurolidine, ethanol, urokinase, Cathasept) +/- anticoagulants, single or in various combinations. The main objective of these studies was to identify the efficacy of ALS with respect to CRBSI risk rates, catheter exchange rates and related adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS- Antimicrobial Locking Therapy appears significantly beneficial forHD patients as it reduces CRBSI risk and prolongs catheter survival at considerable rates, so it should be seriously considered for systematic useagainst catheter-related infections. Further researchis required to establish safe and effective prevention and therapeutic protocols as alternatives to catheter removal practices.

Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/download/0/0/44864/47462 (application/pdf)
http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/view/0/44864 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:72

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Global Journal of Health Science from Canadian Center of Science and Education Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Canadian Center of Science and Education ().

 
Page updated 2021-06-17
Handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:72