Religiosity and Spiritual/Religious Coping in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Elvi Cristina Rojas Fonseca, Adriana Paula da Silva, Heloísa Marcelina da Cunha Palhares, Alzira Mara Cussi Brasileiro Dias, Janaíne Machado Tomé, Flávia Alves Ribeiro, Izabelle Mara Rodrigues Mesquita, Ana Claúdia Moura Caetano Araujo and Maria de Fátima Borges

Global Journal of Health Science, 2022, vol. 14, issue 8, 29

Abstract: BACKGROUND- Spirituality/Religiosity (S/R) plays an important role in chronic diseases coping, improvement of quality of life (QL) and adherence to treatment. There is a gap in studies regarding Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) coping and if S/R can help in metabolic control and complications decrease. OBJECTIVE- To evaluate the religiosity profile and relevance of spiritual/religious coping in adult patients with T1DM. METHOD- This is a cross-sectional, descriptive study conducted in outpatient care in 56 T1DM patients in a tertiary service. Patients filled out questionnaires referring to demographic and clinical data, socioeconomic classification, the Index of Religiosity of the University of Duke - Duke scale (DUREL), and an adaptated Spiritual-Religious Coping scale (SRCOPE). RESULTS- The analysis of the positive SRCOPE (PSRCOPE) showed a low / medium score (3.3 ± 0.7), whereas for the negative SRCOPE (NSRCOPE) it was low (2.0 ± 0.7), and the use of the total SRCOPE was considered high (3.7 ± 0.4), the NSRCOPE/ PSRCOPE ratio was 0.7 ± 0.2, demonstrating a predominance of PSRCOPE in relation to NSRCOPE. The organizational, non-organizational and intrinsic religiosities presented a correlation with PSRCOPE and total SRCOPE. Only intrinsic religiosity showed a significant correlation with anxiety and depression. CONCLUSION- It was found that non-organizational and intrinsic religiosity had a high index. The obtained score for positive and negative SRCOPE showed a PSRCOPE predominance. There was significant correlation, between the scores of religiosity and coping. The next step is to evaluate the impact of these findings in clinical practice.

Date: 2022
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/download/0/0/47516/50953 (application/pdf)
https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/view/0/47516 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:14:y:2022:i:8:p:29

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Global Journal of Health Science from Canadian Center of Science and Education Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Canadian Center of Science and Education ().