Auditing Standard Change and Auditors' Everyday Practice: A Field Study

Federica De Santis

International Business Research, 2016, vol. 9, issue 12, 41-54

Abstract: The analysis of inertial phenomena in business context has been developed with reference to management and financial accounting (Hopwood, 1990; Hopwood and Miller, 1994). In the auditing field, however, only a few studies have attempted the inertial phenomenon (Salterio, 1996; Salterio & Koonce, 1997; O'Reilly, et al., 2004; Messier, et al., 2012). An opportunity to investigate more in depth the topic of auditing inertia is offered by the recent change of the auditing principles in Italy. Stemming from the aforementioned consideration, this paper aims to analyze the phenomenon of auditing inertia making reference to a case of change in the auditing standards and procedures to which auditors refer to in performing audit works. In order to achieve this aim, a field study methodology was adopted. The main findings are the following. First, it emerges that the reactions of the audit firms to the analyzed change of auditing standards are different. Second, the analyzed cases have shown that single auditors have undergone passively through the process of change. Third, the collected evidences also suggest some of the items that contribute to the adoption of an inertial behavior. Fourth, it emerges that the aim of the EU project, the harmonization and adaptability-flexibility of auditing procedures, is only partially achieved as sometimes occurs a substantial harmonization while in other cases it is only formal.

Keywords: auditing; change; audit practice; case study (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/view/63595/34533 (application/pdf)
http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/view/63595 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:9:y:2016:i:12:p:41-54

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Business Research from Canadian Center of Science and Education Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Canadian Center of Science and Education ().