American Option Valuation Methods
International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2018, vol. 10, issue 5, 1-13
This paper implements and compares eight American option valuation methods: binomial, trinomial, explicit finite difference, implicit finite difference and quadratic approximation methods. And three Monte Carlo methods: bundling technique of Tilley (1993), simulated tree (ST) of Broadie, Glasserman, and Jain (1997), and least square regression method (LSM) of Longstaff and Schwartz (2001). Methods are compared in terms of computation efficiency and price accuracy. The findings suggest that binomial is the best performing numerical method in terms of accuracy and efficiency. LSM beats the other two simulation methods in terms of efficiency, accuracy and number of discrete exercise opportunities.
Keywords: American options; numerical methods; binomial tree; simulation method; least square regression method (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: R00 Z0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:10:y:2018:i:5:p:1-13
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in International Journal of Economics and Finance from Canadian Center of Science and Education Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Canadian Center of Science and Education ().