Comparison of Different Methods for Assessing Chlorophyll Content in Citrus
Rivani Oliveira Ferreira,
Marilza Neves do Nascimento,
Luciano da Silva Souza,
Felipe Gomes Frederico da Silveira and
Roberto Toyohiro Shibata
Journal of Agricultural Science, 2018, vol. 10, issue 9, 217
Abstract:
The content of chlorophyll-Chl present in green vegetables is strongly associated with the momentary state of the plant photosynthesis. Conventionally, determination of chlorophyll is by extraction with organic solvents and determining a spectrophotometer, and this method expensive, laborious and moreover a destructive method. Thus, the use of portable equipment has been used instead, as they allow studies without destruction of leaf tissue and obtaining instantaneous measurements. Thus, the aim of correlating the chlorophyll results obtained in the laboratory with Falker Chlorophyll Index (FCI) obtained by the ClorofiLog in different citrus rootstocks, as well asits relationship to soil moisture content variation. Positive simple correlations (linear Pearson correlation) were obtained for chl a, b and total, with the lowest correlation values observed for chl β, which ranged from 0.470-788 among the analyzed rootstocks. The coefficients of determination for the three variables chl α, β and total α+β showed a better fit by the polynomial regression model in all analyzed rootstocks; in general, the best results were for chl α, ranging from 0.7093-0.8551. The results indicate the usefulness of the ChloroflLog apparatus in the indirect determination of chlorophyll content in citrus.
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/75176/42690 (application/pdf)
https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/75176 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:10:y:2018:i:9:p:217
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Agricultural Science from Canadian Center of Science and Education Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Canadian Center of Science and Education (jas@ccsenet.org).