Assessing Herbicide Use and Hand Weeding Efficacy in Groundnut Production Intensification

Paul Anguria, Essegbemon Akpo, Chris O. Ojiewo and Michael A. Ugen

Journal of Agricultural Science, 2025, vol. 17, issue 4, 69

Abstract: Poor and costly weed management constrains Groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) production in Uganda. A field study was therefore conducted at the National Semi-Arid Resources Research Institute (NaSARRI), Serere, Uganda during the long rains of 2020 and 2021 and short rains of 2020 to evaluate the efficacy of hand weeding and different herbicides on weed management, yield, and the economics of their use in groundnut. The experiment for this study comprised 7 treatments constituted by six herbicides; four pre-emergent (Glyphosate, Clethodim, S-Metolachlar, and 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid), and two post-emergent (Bentazone and Quizalofop-p-ethyl) and hand weeding. Post-emergence herbicide application and hand weeding were done at 30, 45, and 60 DAS. The treatments were laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. Calculated weed indices show the effect of weed control measures on groundnut weeds. Pre-emergence application of glyphosate followed by post-emergence application of Quizalofop-p-ethyl produced superior pod yield (1724.3 kg/ha), the lowest weed density of grass (0.62), and Sedges (0.61), the lowest weed biomass at harvest (122.5g), the highest percentage of weed control efficiency (69.65%), and highest net returns (7,937,746UGX/ha). However, post-emergence sole application of quizalofop-p-ethyl produced the highest B- C ratio (36.49). Therefore, this study has indicated that the pre-emergence application of glyphosate followed by the post-emergence application of quizalofop-p-ethyl is the most profitable weed control measure in groundnut; while the post-emergence sole application of quizalofop-p-ethyl is the most economical. Hand weeding though may be used where labour is cheap and not scarce as opposed to the herbicides.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/0/0/51419/55866 (application/pdf)
https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/0/51419 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:69

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Agricultural Science from Canadian Center of Science and Education Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Canadian Center of Science and Education ().