The Economical Feasibility of Large Animal Composting

Joe Parcell, Joe Horner, Ryan Millhollin and Jason Franken

Journal of Agricultural Science, 2015, vol. 7, issue 5, 19

Abstract: This study examines the economic feasibility of 4 alternative large animal mortality composting systems that a producer-owned entity could potentially operate. The 4 systems evaluated are a vertical mechanical composter (Dutch Composter), a horizontal mechanical composter (BIOvatorTM), an open static pile yard and a roofed or covered static pile yard. This study includes a 5-year pro forma financial analysis and suggests recommendations regarding the most economically viable and environmentally appropriate alternatives. Based on the financial analysis and the current regulatory environment, the recommended compost system for a regional animal mortality facility is static piles under roof. However, alternative technologies may be feasible in other scenarios.

Date: 2015
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/41489/25574 (application/pdf)
https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/41489 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:7:y:2015:i:5:p:19

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Agricultural Science from Canadian Center of Science and Education Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Canadian Center of Science and Education ().