Positive Accounting Theory: A Critique

Suyash Kamal Sinha

The IUP Journal of Accounting Research and Audit Practices, 2008, vol. VII, issue 4, 7-16

Abstract: The primary objective of Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) is to explain as well as predict accounting practices in contrast to the Normative Accounting Theories, which are prescriptive in nature and which were a dominant part of accounting research till the two controversial articles were published by Watts and Zimmerman in 1978. It was a revolutionary idea, which raised a number of issues prompting researchers to debate the technical issues concerning research methods, issues related to philosophy of science and issues concerning economics-based research in accounting. This paper attempts to review these issues and the validity of the questions raised from such issues involved. As pointed out by various authors, there is a need to integrate the two approaches of the discipline to evolve its full potential. The best theory or the approach emerges not in isolation, but as a result of intense arguments, giving due weight to the others’ view point.

Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:icf:icfjar:v:07:y:2008:i:4:p:7-16

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in The IUP Journal of Accounting Research and Audit Practices from IUP Publications
Bibliographic data for series maintained by G R K Murty ().