AN IMPLEMENTABLE INSTITUTIONAL REFORM THAT TRANSFERS CONTROL OF GOVERNMENT SPENDING LEVELS FROM POLITICIANS TO VOTERS
Philip Graves ()
The IUP Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 2011, vol. VI, issue 4, 53-66
Elected representatives have little incentive to pursue the interests of those electing them once they are elected. This well-known principal-agent problem leads, in a variety of theories of government, to non-optimally large levels of government expenditure. An implication is that budgetary rules are seen as necessary to constrain politicians’ tax and spending behavior. Popular among such constraints are various Balanced Budget Amendment proposals. These approaches, however, are shown here to have serious limitations, including failure to address the central concern of spending level. An alternative approach is advanced here that relies on a Coase-like mechanism that transfers control of government spending to the voter. Prisoner’s Dilemma incentives and political competition are seen to be critical to the superiority of the present mechanism to approaches requiring budget balance.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:icf:icfjgp:v:06:y:2011:i:4:p:53-66
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in The IUP Journal of Governance and Public Policy from IUP Publications
Series data maintained by G R K Murty ().