 The comparability effects of principles based standardsDavid Cabán American Journal of Finance and Accounting, 2025, vol. 8, issue 3, 195-216 Abstract: This paper delves into the impact of transitioning from rules-based to principles-based accounting standards and its effect on financial statement comparability. The study leverages the ASC 606 adoption as a unique event to assess how this shift influenced the comparability of financial statements across industries and its effect on analyst coverage. Drawing upon the foundational work of De Franco et al. (2011) to develop a financial comparability measure, the paper evaluates the research question employing multi-variate regression models to explore potential changes in comparability across firms between the Pre-ASC 606 and the ASC 606 period. The findings indicate an improvement in financial statement comparability at the market level, with a more pronounced effect within industries characterised by high recurring revenues. Furthermore, the study reveals a positive correlation between improved financial statement comparability and increased analyst coverage, implying that enhanced transparency under principles-based accounting standards makes firms more attractive to analysts. Keywords: principles-based accounting; rules-based accounting; financial statement comparability; analyst coverage; ASC606. (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:amerfa:v:8:y:2025:i:3:p:195-216 Access Statistics for this article More articles in American Journal of Finance and Accounting from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.